Ash: Difference between revisions

From ahitipua
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
(25 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Explosive volcanic eruptions typically eject hot mixtures of fragmented rock (tephra or ash) and
Explosive volcanic eruptions typically eject hot mixtures of fragmented rock (tephra or ash) and volcanic gases into the atmosphere to form a volcanic plume. The most common forms of magma can be divided into three broad types, based on their chemical composition:
volcanic gases into the atmosphere to form a volcanic plume. The commonest forms of magma
can be divided into three broad types based on their chemical composition:


1. Basaltic magma (SiO<sub>2</sub> 45-55 wt%, high in Fe, Mg, Ca, low in K, Na)
1. Basaltic magma (SiO<sub>2</sub> 45-55 wt%; high in Fe, Mg, Ca; low in K, Na)


2. Andesitic magma (SiO<sub>2</sub> 55-65 wt%, intermediate in Fe, Mg, Ca, Na, K)
2. Andesitic magma (SiO<sub>2</sub> 55-65 wt%; intermediate in Fe, Mg, Ca, Na, K)


3. Rhyolitic magma (SiO<sub>2</sub> 65-75%, low in Fe, Mg, Ca, high in K, Na)
3. Rhyolitic magma (SiO<sub>2</sub> 65-75%; low in Fe, Mg, Ca; high in K, Na)


Changes in style of activity are common during eruptions, with explosive eruptions being
Changes in style of activity are common during eruptions, with explosive eruptions being particularly favoured by high (magmatic) gas content, and high melt viscosity (andesitic to rhyolitic
particularly favoured by high (magmatic) gas content, and high melt viscosity (andesitic to rhyolitic
magmas), or by the presence of external water (e.g. Sheridan and Wohletz, 1983<ref>Sheridan, M.F. and K.H. Wohletz, "Hydrovolcanism: Basic considerations and review", ''JVGR'', '''17''', 1-29, 1983</ref>, Scandone et al., 2007<ref>Scandone, R., K.V. Cashman and S.D. Malone, "Magma supply, magma ascent and the style of volcanic eruptions", ''EPSL'', '''253(3-4)''', 513-529, 2007</ref>). Volcanic plumes formed by explosive eruptions are mixtures of gas, quenched and fragmented silicate material (tephra) and other aerosol particles derived from both the magmatic emissions and background air (e.g. Durant et al., 2010<ref>Durant, A.J., Bonadonna, C. and Horwell, C.J., "Atmospheric and Environmental Impacts of Volcanic Particulates", ''Elements'', '''6(4)''', 235-240, 2010</ref>, Ilyinskaya et al., 2010<ref>Ilyinskaya, E., C. Oppenheimer, T.A. Mather, R.S. Martin and P.R. Kyle, "Size-resolved chemical composition of aerosol emittedby Erebus volcano, Antarctica", ''Geochem. Geophys. Geosys.'', '''11(3)''', Q03017, 2010</ref>, Oppenheimer et al., 2010<ref>Oppenheimer, C., P. Kyle, F. Eisele et al., "Atmospheric chemistry of an Antarctic volcanic plume", ''JGR: Atmospheres'', '''115(D4)''', D04303, 2010</ref>). The smaller solid particles (radii < 2 mm) are referred to as volcanic ash. Component and morphological analyses of the erupted ash, and comparison of these data with those from other monitoring techniques, demonstrates a clear relationship between ash features and styles of explosive activity (e.g. Heiken and Wohletz, 1985<ref>Heiken, G. and K. Wohletz, "Volcanic Ash", University of California Press, Berkeley, 245 pp, 1985</ref>, Martin et al., 2008<ref>Martin, R.S., T.A. Mather, D.M. Pyle et al., "Composition-resolved size distributions of volcani aerosols in the Mt. Etna plumes", ''JGR: Atmospheres'', '''113(D17)''', D17211, 2008</ref>, Rust and Cashman, 2011<ref>Rust, A. and K. Cashman, "Permeability controls on expansion and size distributions of pyroclasts", ''JGR: Solid Earth'' 2011</ref>, Taddeucci et al., 2004<ref>Taddeucci, J., O. Spieler, B. Kennedy, M. Pompilio, D.B. Dingwell and P. Scarlato, "Experimental and analytical modelling of basaltic ash explosions at Mount Etna, Italy, 2001", ''JGR: Solid Earth'', '''109''', B08203, 2004</ref><ref>Taddeucci, J., M. Pompilio and P. Scarlato, "Conduit processes during the July–August 2001 explosive activity of Mt. Etna (Italy): inferences from glass chemistry and crystal size distribution of ash particles", ''JVGR'', '''137(1-3)''', 33-54, 2004</ref>).
magmas), or by the presence of external water (e.g. Sheridan and Wohletz, 1983; Scandone et al.,
 
2007). Volcanic plumes formed by explosive eruptions are mixtures of gas, quenched and
The effects of airborne ash include:
fragmented silicate material (tephra) and other aerosol particles derived from both the magmatic
emissions and background air (e.g. Durant et al., 2010; Ilyinskaya et al., 2010; Oppenheimer et al
2010). The smaller solid particles (radii < 2 mm) are referred to as volcanic ash. Component and
morphological analyses of the erupted ash, and comparison of these data with those from other
monitoring techniques, demonstrates a clear relationship between ash features and styles of
explosive activity (e.g. Heiken and Wohletz, 1985; Martin et al., 2008; Rust and Cashman, 2011,
Taddeucci et al. 2004). The effects of airborne ash include:


'''Climate:''' Injection of volcanic ash into the stratosphere and troposphere influences the Earth’s
'''Climate:''' Injection of volcanic ash into the stratosphere and troposphere influences the Earth’s
Line 27: Line 18:
quiescent degassing (Yuan et al., 2011) to large volcanic eruption plumes.
quiescent degassing (Yuan et al., 2011) to large volcanic eruption plumes.


'''Aviation:'''Aviation: Before March 2010 the Civil Aviation Authority did not permit civil aircraft to fly in the
'''Aviation:''' Before March 2010 the Civil Aviation Authority did not permit civil aircraft to fly in the
presence of volcanic ash. Following the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull eruption this zero-tolerance approach
presence of volcanic ash. Following the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull eruption, this zero-tolerance approach
was changed to permit flights within ash concentrations less than 2 x 10<sup>-3</sup> g cm<sup>-3</sup> (CAA, 2010).
was changed to permit flights within ash concentrations less than 2 x 10<sup>-3</sup> g cm<sup>-3</sup> (CAA, 2010).


Line 34: Line 25:
known to result in serious injury or disease from inhalation. However acute respiratory symptoms
known to result in serious injury or disease from inhalation. However acute respiratory symptoms
are commonly reported by people during and after ash falls (Blong, 1984)
are commonly reported by people during and after ash falls (Blong, 1984)
Heavy ash fall may result in the collapse of roofs under the weight of ash and this can be deadly
for people within buildings. The deposition of volcanic ash can increase trace metal (iron)
concentrations in the local environment (ocean), especially following explosive eruptions (Martin et
al., 2009), and this can increase the productivity of phytoplankton in areas with limited nutrients
(Jones and Gislason, 2008; Gabrielli et al., 2008).


Heavy ash fall may result in the collapse of roofs under the weight of ash and this can be deadly
Heavy ash fall may result in the collapse of roofs under the weight of ash and this can be deadly
Line 68: Line 54:
coefficients computed using the same
coefficients computed using the same
size-distribution (with an effective radius
size-distribution (with an effective radius
of 2 m) and different refractive indexes.
of 2 μm) and different refractive indexes.


The published infrared spectral refractive index of volcano-related ash
The published infrared spectral refractive index of volcano-related ash
Line 74: Line 60:
This is reflected in the variability of IR spectra measured from satellites
This is reflected in the variability of IR spectra measured from satellites
for different volcanoes and eruptions (Clarisse, 2010; Gangale, 2010).
for different volcanoes and eruptions (Clarisse, 2010; Gangale, 2010).
==See Also==
[http://www.atm.ox.ac.uk/project/volcano/nrtvm/index.html Near real time SEVIRI RGB Composites Ash]<br>
[http://www.atm.ox.ac.uk/project/volcano/ash/index.html Volcanic Ash Spectroscopy]<br>
[http://www.atm.ox.ac.uk/project/RI/index.html ARIA refractive index database]<br>


<br>
<br>
Line 84: Line 65:
Different instruments (and platform) can be used for ash analysis:
Different instruments (and platform) can be used for ash analysis:


'''Imagers'''<br>
{| class="wikitable" border="1"
|+Polar Orbiting Satellites (LEO)
|-
! Instrument
! Platform
! Agency
! Service Start
! Service End
|-
!align="center" colspan="5"| '''Imagers'''
|-
| AVHRR
| TIROS-N; NOAA 6-19; MetOp-A
| NOAA / ESA
| 1978
| Present
|-
| ATSR-2
| ERS-2
| ESA
| 1995
| 09/2011
|-
| ASTER
| EOS-Terra
| NASA
| 2000
| Present
|-
| AATSR
| ENVISAT
| ESA
| 2002
| 03/2012
|-
| MERIS
| ENVISAT
| ESA
| 2002
| 03/2012
|-
| MODIS
| EOS-Terra<br/>EOS-Aqua
| NASA
| 2000<br/>2002
| Present<br/>Present
|-
!align="center" colspan="5"|'''Lidar'''
|-
| CALIPO
| CALIPSO
| NASA
| 2006
| Present
|-
!align="center" colspan="5"|'''IR Spectrometers'''
|-
| AIRS
| EOS-Aqua
| NASA
| 2002
| Present
|-
| TES
| EOS-Aura
| NASA
| 2004
| Present
|-
| IASI
| MetOp-A<br/>MetOp-B
| ESA
| 2006<br/>2012
| Present<br/>Present
|-
!align="center" colspan="5"|'''Limb/Occultation Instruments'''
|-
| SAGE
| AEM-B
| NASA
| 1979
| 1982
|-
| SAGE-2
| ERBS
| NASA
| 10/1984
| 10/2005
|-
| MIPAS
| ENVISAT
| ESA
| 2002
| 03/2012
|-
| HIRDLS
| EOS-Aura
| NASA
| 2004
| Present
|-
!align="center" colspan="5"|'''UV/VIS spectrometers'''
|-
| GOME
| ERS-2
| ESA
| 06/1995
| 07/2011
|-
| SCIAMACHY
| ENVISAT
| ESA
| 2002
| 03/2012
|-
| OMI
| EOS-Aura
| NASA
| 2004
| Present
|-
| GOME-2
| MetOp-A<br/>MetOp-B
| ESA
| 2006<br/>2012
| Present<br/>Present
|-
|}


Polar Orbit:<br>
{| class="wikitable" border="1"
AVHRR (NOAA-1979, 1981...)<br>
|+ Geostationary satellites (GEO)
ATSR-2 (ERS-2 1995)<br>
|-
ASTER (TERRA 2000)<br>
! Instrument
AATSR (ENVISAT 2002)<br>
! Platform
MERIS (ENVISAT 2002)<br>
! Agency
MODIS (TERRA 2000, AQUA 2002)<br>
! Service Start
! Service End
|-
!align="center" colspan="5"| '''Imagers'''
|-
| SEVIRI
| MSG-8<br/>MSG-9<br/>MSG-10
| ESA
| 08/2002<br/>12/2005<br/>07/2012
| ~2019<br/>~2021<br/>~2022
|-
| Sounder/Imager
| GOES 8-12
| NOAA
| 1994
| Present
|-
| MTSAT-1R<br/>MTSAT-2
|
| JAXA
| 06/2005<br/>07/2010
| Present<br/>Present
|-
|}


Geostationary:<br>
==See Also==
SEVIRI (METEOSAT 2004)<br>
[http://www.atm.ox.ac.uk/project/volcano/nrtvm/index.html Near real time SEVIRI RGB Composites Ash]<br>
GOES<br>
[http://www.atm.ox.ac.uk/project/volcano/ash/index.html Volcanic Ash Spectroscopy]<br>
MTSAT<br>
[http://www.atm.ox.ac.uk/project/RI/index.html ARIA refractive index database]<br>


'''Lidar'''<br>
==References==
CALIOP (CALIPSO 2006)
{{reflist|2}}
 
'''IR spectrometer'''<br>
AIRS (AQUA 2002)<br>
TES (AURA 2004)<br>
IASI (METOP-A 2006, METOP-B 2012)<br>
 
'''Limb/occultation instruments'''<br>
SAGE <br>
SAGE II (1984)<br>
MIPAS (ENVISAT 2002)<br>
HIRDLS (AURA 2004)<br>
 
'''UV/VIS spectrometer'''<br>
GOME (ERS-2 1995)<br>
SCIAMACHY (ENVISAT 2002)<br>
OMI (AURA 2004)<br>
GOME-2 (METOP 2006)<br>
<br>

Latest revision as of 18:26, 7 November 2013

Explosive volcanic eruptions typically eject hot mixtures of fragmented rock (tephra or ash) and volcanic gases into the atmosphere to form a volcanic plume. The most common forms of magma can be divided into three broad types, based on their chemical composition:

1. Basaltic magma (SiO2 45-55 wt%; high in Fe, Mg, Ca; low in K, Na)

2. Andesitic magma (SiO2 55-65 wt%; intermediate in Fe, Mg, Ca, Na, K)

3. Rhyolitic magma (SiO2 65-75%; low in Fe, Mg, Ca; high in K, Na)

Changes in style of activity are common during eruptions, with explosive eruptions being particularly favoured by high (magmatic) gas content, and high melt viscosity (andesitic to rhyolitic magmas), or by the presence of external water (e.g. Sheridan and Wohletz, 1983[1], Scandone et al., 2007[2]). Volcanic plumes formed by explosive eruptions are mixtures of gas, quenched and fragmented silicate material (tephra) and other aerosol particles derived from both the magmatic emissions and background air (e.g. Durant et al., 2010[3], Ilyinskaya et al., 2010[4], Oppenheimer et al., 2010[5]). The smaller solid particles (radii < 2 mm) are referred to as volcanic ash. Component and morphological analyses of the erupted ash, and comparison of these data with those from other monitoring techniques, demonstrates a clear relationship between ash features and styles of explosive activity (e.g. Heiken and Wohletz, 1985[6], Martin et al., 2008[7], Rust and Cashman, 2011[8], Taddeucci et al., 2004[9][10]).

The effects of airborne ash include:

Climate: Injection of volcanic ash into the stratosphere and troposphere influences the Earth’s radiation balance by interacting with both solar and thermal radiation as a function of the ash’s optical properties (IPCC 2007). In the troposphere volcanic aerosols indirectly modify climate by acting as cloud condensation nuclei. This happens over the range of volcanic activity from quiescent degassing (Yuan et al., 2011) to large volcanic eruption plumes.

Aviation: Before March 2010 the Civil Aviation Authority did not permit civil aircraft to fly in the presence of volcanic ash. Following the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull eruption, this zero-tolerance approach was changed to permit flights within ash concentrations less than 2 x 10-3 g cm-3 (CAA, 2010).

Human Health: High levels of respirable ash (particle radius less than 5 μm) in the air are not yet known to result in serious injury or disease from inhalation. However acute respiratory symptoms are commonly reported by people during and after ash falls (Blong, 1984)

Heavy ash fall may result in the collapse of roofs under the weight of ash and this can be deadly for people within buildings. The deposition of volcanic ash can increase trace metal (iron) concentrations in the local environment (ocean), especially following explosive eruptions (Martin et al., 2009), and this can increase the productivity of phytoplankton in areas with limited nutrients (Jones and Gislason, 2008; Gabrielli et al., 2008).

Quantifying the effects of ash requires knowledge of ash loading, composition, morphology and size, as well as the physical dimensions and location of the ash plume. In addition, tephra from explosive volcanic eruptions holds information about magma dynamics in the critical zone where fragmentation occurs and eruption style is decided.

The infrared (IR) transmission or emission spectra of volcanic plumes shows a rapid variation with wavelength due to absorption lines from atmospheric and volcanic gases as well as broad scale features principally due to particulate absorption. While the gas lines have provided important insights into volcanic processes (Burton et al., 2001, 2003; Oppenheimer et al., 2006; Edmonds, 2003, Sawyer et al 2008) the ash features have not been analysed to the same extent. The ash signature depends on the composition and size distribution of ash particles.

Figure 1. Extinction coefficients obtained for ice, volcanic ash (Peters, 2012), pumice, andesite, H2SO4, quartz, chlorite, obsidian.


Figure 1 shows an example of different extinction coefficients computed using the same size-distribution (with an effective radius of 2 μm) and different refractive indexes.

The published infrared spectral refractive index of volcano-related ash and rock shows a large variability, presumably because the ash composition is changing. This is reflected in the variability of IR spectra measured from satellites for different volcanoes and eruptions (Clarisse, 2010; Gangale, 2010).


Satellite data

Different instruments (and platform) can be used for ash analysis:

Polar Orbiting Satellites (LEO)
Instrument Platform Agency Service Start Service End
Imagers
AVHRR TIROS-N; NOAA 6-19; MetOp-A NOAA / ESA 1978 Present
ATSR-2 ERS-2 ESA 1995 09/2011
ASTER EOS-Terra NASA 2000 Present
AATSR ENVISAT ESA 2002 03/2012
MERIS ENVISAT ESA 2002 03/2012
MODIS EOS-Terra
EOS-Aqua
NASA 2000
2002
Present
Present
Lidar
CALIPO CALIPSO NASA 2006 Present
IR Spectrometers
AIRS EOS-Aqua NASA 2002 Present
TES EOS-Aura NASA 2004 Present
IASI MetOp-A
MetOp-B
ESA 2006
2012
Present
Present
Limb/Occultation Instruments
SAGE AEM-B NASA 1979 1982
SAGE-2 ERBS NASA 10/1984 10/2005
MIPAS ENVISAT ESA 2002 03/2012
HIRDLS EOS-Aura NASA 2004 Present
UV/VIS spectrometers
GOME ERS-2 ESA 06/1995 07/2011
SCIAMACHY ENVISAT ESA 2002 03/2012
OMI EOS-Aura NASA 2004 Present
GOME-2 MetOp-A
MetOp-B
ESA 2006
2012
Present
Present
Geostationary satellites (GEO)
Instrument Platform Agency Service Start Service End
Imagers
SEVIRI MSG-8
MSG-9
MSG-10
ESA 08/2002
12/2005
07/2012
~2019
~2021
~2022
Sounder/Imager GOES 8-12 NOAA 1994 Present
MTSAT-1R
MTSAT-2
JAXA 06/2005
07/2010
Present
Present

See Also

Near real time SEVIRI RGB Composites Ash
Volcanic Ash Spectroscopy
ARIA refractive index database

References

  1. Sheridan, M.F. and K.H. Wohletz, "Hydrovolcanism: Basic considerations and review", JVGR, 17, 1-29, 1983
  2. Scandone, R., K.V. Cashman and S.D. Malone, "Magma supply, magma ascent and the style of volcanic eruptions", EPSL, 253(3-4), 513-529, 2007
  3. Durant, A.J., Bonadonna, C. and Horwell, C.J., "Atmospheric and Environmental Impacts of Volcanic Particulates", Elements, 6(4), 235-240, 2010
  4. Ilyinskaya, E., C. Oppenheimer, T.A. Mather, R.S. Martin and P.R. Kyle, "Size-resolved chemical composition of aerosol emittedby Erebus volcano, Antarctica", Geochem. Geophys. Geosys., 11(3), Q03017, 2010
  5. Oppenheimer, C., P. Kyle, F. Eisele et al., "Atmospheric chemistry of an Antarctic volcanic plume", JGR: Atmospheres, 115(D4), D04303, 2010
  6. Heiken, G. and K. Wohletz, "Volcanic Ash", University of California Press, Berkeley, 245 pp, 1985
  7. Martin, R.S., T.A. Mather, D.M. Pyle et al., "Composition-resolved size distributions of volcani aerosols in the Mt. Etna plumes", JGR: Atmospheres, 113(D17), D17211, 2008
  8. Rust, A. and K. Cashman, "Permeability controls on expansion and size distributions of pyroclasts", JGR: Solid Earth 2011
  9. Taddeucci, J., O. Spieler, B. Kennedy, M. Pompilio, D.B. Dingwell and P. Scarlato, "Experimental and analytical modelling of basaltic ash explosions at Mount Etna, Italy, 2001", JGR: Solid Earth, 109, B08203, 2004
  10. Taddeucci, J., M. Pompilio and P. Scarlato, "Conduit processes during the July–August 2001 explosive activity of Mt. Etna (Italy): inferences from glass chemistry and crystal size distribution of ash particles", JVGR, 137(1-3), 33-54, 2004